Rail Lines and Demarcation Lines: A Response

26 Pages Posted: 10 Jul 2015 Last revised: 11 Jul 2015

Date Written: July 8, 2015


In Ferwerda and Miller (2014), we assess whether granting governing authority to natives reduces resistance to foreign rule. We find that devolving authority significantly lowered levels of violent resistance in WW2 France, an effect we argue is driven by a process of political cooptation. Kocher and Monteiro (2015) challenge these results, arguing that the Germans deliberately placed the demarcation line in proximity to strategic railroads, and that due to external involvement by Allies, the locations of resistance events should not be used to infer political motivations. In this research note, we argue that these critiques do not undermine our core findings. Specifically, we demonstrate (1) that Kocher and Monteiro's account overstates the importance of 'strategic' railways in determining the location of the line, (2) that the presence of these railway lines cannot fully account for our findings, and (3) that resistance was locally-rooted, began before D-Day, and was not directed by the Allies in the regions from which we derive our inferences.

Keywords: occupation, resistance, World War II

JEL Classification: C99, N44

Suggested Citation

Ferwerda, Jeremy and Miller, Nicholas, Rail Lines and Demarcation Lines: A Response (July 8, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2628508 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2628508

Jeremy Ferwerda (Contact Author)

Dartmouth College ( email )

Department of Sociology
Hanover, NH 03755
United States

Nicholas Miller

Brown University ( email )

Box 1860
Providence, RI 02912
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics