The Riddle of Ruth Bryan Owen

70 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2015 Last revised: 30 Aug 2018

See all articles by Daniel B. Rice

Daniel B. Rice

Georgetown University Law Center

Date Written: July 9, 2015

Abstract

This Article recovers a lost chapter of constitutional history — the ill-fated challenge to Ruth Bryan Owen’s congressional eligibility. Owen was the brilliant (and American-born) daughter of famed politician William Jennings Bryan, and a pioneering figure in her own right. But the Expatriation Act of 1907 stripped Owen of her American citizenship when she took a British husband. Congress swiftly repealed this loathsome feature after the Nineteenth Amendment’s ratification. Yet Owen’s defeated opponent claimed that she hadn’t “been seven Years a Citizen of the United States” as the Constitution requires. Because Owen had been a naturalized citizen for only three years at the time of her 1928 election, the House faced an unenviable adjudicative dilemma: does “seven Years” mean the immediately preceding seven years, or any seven years cumulatively?

Owen’s case demonstrates that the perceived clarity of even “mathematical” constitutional provisions can be shaped by purposive and pragmatic considerations extraneous to the text, considerations that often change in light of freshly received facts. This Article also presents powerful new evidence that women came to be seen as improper objects of state-sanctioned discrimination soon after the Nineteenth Amendment’s ratification. Owen’s triumph marks an important turning point in American women’s effort to achieve full constitutional equality. Because scholars have forgotten her story, they have overlooked crucial sources that might have helped provide a historically firmer basis for modern sex-discrimination doctrine. And as Owen’s case shows, historical practices repugnant to the modern constitutional order should never be accorded residual legal effect. This Article accordingly criticizes the Supreme Court’s plurality opinion in Kerry v. Din (2015) for citing the Expatriation Act to downplay an asserted liberty interest’s historical pedigree under the Due Process Clause.

Keywords: constitutional history, Congress, citizenship, Nineteenth Amendment, equal protection, constitutional theory, expatriation, naturalization

JEL Classification: K39

Suggested Citation

Rice, Daniel B., The Riddle of Ruth Bryan Owen (July 9, 2015). 29 Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 1 (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2628790 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2628790

Daniel B. Rice (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
175
rank
162,983
Abstract Views
1,235
PlumX Metrics