Pro-Arbitration Policy in the Australian Courts - The End of Eisenwerk?

Federal Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2013

34 Pages Posted: 17 Jul 2015 Last revised: 23 Jul 2015

See all articles by Benjamin Hayward

Benjamin Hayward

Monash University - Department of Business Law & Taxation

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

International arbitration is an important area of federal jurisdiction and federal legislative competence, and has attracted significant policy attention in Australia. This paper undertakes a study of pro-arbitration judicial policy in recent arbitration-related Australian case law which touches upon the continuing applicability of the controversial 1999 Eisenwerk decision of the Queensland Court of Appeal. Against this pro-arbitration judicial policy context, this paper reviews five Eisenwerk-related cases handed down between 2010 and 2012. It concludes that despite pro-arbitration judicial policy being embedded as a requirement of reasoning in decisions under the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth), there is mixed evidence of such policy in the cases surveyed. This paper concludes that the extent to which this policy is evidenced largely corresponds with the degree to which contemporary decisions have departed from Eisenwerk.

Keywords: arbitration, pro-arbitration policy, eisenwerk, interpretation, doctrine of precedent

Suggested Citation

Hayward, Benjamin, Pro-Arbitration Policy in the Australian Courts - The End of Eisenwerk? (2013). Federal Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2013, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2631383

Benjamin Hayward (Contact Author)

Monash University - Department of Business Law & Taxation ( email )

Caulfield Campus
Sir John Monash Drive
Caulfield East, Victoria 3084
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
83
Abstract Views
832
Rank
641,308
PlumX Metrics