No Asylum for 'Infiltrators': The Legal Predicament of Eritrean and Sudanese Nationals in Israel

(2015) 29(2) Journal of Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law 172-191

20 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2015 Last revised: 30 Sep 2015

See all articles by Reuven Ziegler

Reuven Ziegler

University of Reading School of Law; Refugee Studies Centre; Refugee Law Initiative; Israel Democracy Insttitute; University of Oxford Faculty of Law; Lincoln College

Date Written: June 1, 2015

Abstract

This article explores the precarious status of Eritrean and Sudanese nationals in Israel. Having crossed the Israeli-Egyptian border without authorisation and not through an official border crossing, Israeli law defines such individuals as ‘infiltrators’, a charged term which dates back to border-crossings into Israel by Palestinian Fedayeen in the 1950s. Eritreans and Sudanese nationals constitute over 90 percent of ‘infiltrators’ in Israel. Their livelihood is curtailed through hostility, sanctions, and detention, while (at the time of writing) Israel refrains from deporting them to their respective countries of origin, recognising that such forced removal could expose them to risks to their lives and/or freedom.

Notably, Israel was the 10th state to ratify the 1951 Refugee Convention, and has acceded to its 1967 Protocol which removed the 1951 Convention’s temporal and geographic restrictions, yet it has not incorporated these treaties into its domestic law not has it enacted primary legislation that sets eligibility criteria for ‘refugee’ status and regulates the treatment of asylum-seekers. Israeli law also fails to accord subsidiary protection status to persons that the state considers to be non-removable, whether or not they satisfy the definition of a ‘refugee’ under the 1951 Convention. Absent legal recognition of ‘refugee’, ‘asylum-seeker’, and ‘beneficiary of subsidiary protection’ statuses, Eritreans and Sudanese nationals are left in legal limbo for an indefinite period qua irregular non-removable persons. This article takes stock of their legal predicament.

The analysis proceeds in five parts. Part A situates the non-regularisation of asylum in Israel in a historical-political context, and sheds light on the role of international law obligations in Israeli jurisprudence, particularly in relation to the application of non-refoulement. Part B explores the precarious legal status of Eritreans and Sudanese ‘infiltrators’ in Israel. The state’s Refugee Status Determination (RSD) process (which, until 2013, they could not access) sports a dismal 0.25% recognition rate. Meanwhile, as non-removable ‘infiltrators’, Eritreans and Sudanese nationals are subject to a rights-restrictive Conditional Release Visa (CRV) regime, and to (seemingly inconsistent) policies regarding their access to employment. Prospects for regularisation of their status are dim. Part C describes how the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, on three occasions (in 2012, 2013 and 2014) enacted legislation mandating various forms of detention of ‘infiltrators’. The Israeli Supreme Court, sitting as a High Court of Justice (HCJ), quashed the first two enactments for disproportionately violating the constitutional rights to liberty and human dignity to which ‘every person’ is entitled under Israeli law. A petition against the third enactment is pending. The state’s overt aims in pursuing the policies explored in Parts B and C are to encourage ‘infiltrators’ to depart (which includes offering them financial incentives) and to discourage new ‘infiltrators’ from arriving. Part D demonstrates how the legal treatment of ‘infiltrators’ dovetails a prevailing political discourse which considers the ‘infiltration’ phenomenon to pose demographic, national, and personal security threats. Part E concludes by submitting that regularisation of asylum in Israel is long due.

Keywords: refugees, asylum-seekers, Israel, RSD, Eritea, Sudan, subsidiary protection, 1951 Covention

Suggested Citation

Ziegler, Reuven, No Asylum for 'Infiltrators': The Legal Predicament of Eritrean and Sudanese Nationals in Israel (June 1, 2015). (2015) 29(2) Journal of Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law 172-191. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2632503

Reuven Ziegler (Contact Author)

University of Reading School of Law ( email )

Foxhill House
Whiteknights House
Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AH
United Kingdom
01183787518 (Phone)

Refugee Studies Centre ( email )

Queen Elizabeth House
3 Mansfield Road
Oxford, OX1 3TB
United Kingdom

Refugee Law Initiative ( email )

Senate House
Malet Street
London, WC1E 7HU
United Kingdom

Israel Democracy Insttitute ( email )

4 Pinsker St.
Jerusalem
Israel

University of Oxford Faculty of Law ( email )

St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom

Lincoln College ( email )

Lincoln College
Oxford, OX1 3DR
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
263
rank
113,814
Abstract Views
1,452
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information