Justice Thomas and the Originalist Turn in Administrative Law

10 Pages Posted: 21 Jul 2015 Last revised: 23 Jul 2015

Date Written: July 15, 2015

Abstract

Until recently, it seemed that administrative law was beyond the reach of originalism at the Supreme Court. But this past term, Justice Thomas wrote six concurring and dissenting opinions amounting to a systematic originalist critique of administrative law.

In these cases–AAR, Perez, B&B Hardware, Wellness International, Texas Department of Housing, and Michigan v. EPA – Justice Thomas re-examined non-delegation, judicial deference, and agency adjudication of private rights. This Essay highlights that these opinions are the first sustained originalist analysis of administrative law by a Justice. It also identifies the ways in which the opinions connect to each other, to scholarship, to previous opinions, and to possible future opinions.

Suggested Citation

Lipshutz, Brian, Justice Thomas and the Originalist Turn in Administrative Law (July 15, 2015). Yale Law Journal Forum, 2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2633211
No contact information is available for Brian Lipshutz

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
135
rank
199,637
Abstract Views
603
PlumX