Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Teaching Criminal Procedure: Why Socrates Would Use YouTube

50 Pages Posted: 1 Aug 2015 Last revised: 1 Jun 2016

Stephen E. Henderson

University of Oklahoma College of Law

Joseph T. Thai

University of Oklahoma - College of Law

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

In this invited contribution to the Law Journal’s annual Teaching Issue, we pay some homage to the great philosopher whose spirit allegedly guides our classrooms, in service of two concrete goals. One, we employ dialogue to describe the "nuts and bolts" of teaching Criminal Procedure, most of which are equally relevant to any doctrinal law school course (including course description, office hours, seating charts and attendance, class decorum and recording, student participation, laptops, textbooks, class preparation and presentation, and exams). Two, we explain the benefits of using multimedia in the classroom, including a few of the many modules found on our Crimprof Multipedia service. We organize its benefits into four “h’s” (humor, humanization, headlines, and hypotheticals), and we give several examples of each for a topic that pervades criminal procedure: racial (in)justice.

Keywords: teaching, pedagogy, criminal procedure, race

JEL Classification: K10, K14

Suggested Citation

Henderson, Stephen E. and Thai, Joseph T., Teaching Criminal Procedure: Why Socrates Would Use YouTube (2016). St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 60, No. 3, 2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2637408

Stephen Henderson (Contact Author)

University of Oklahoma College of Law ( email )

300 Timberdell Road
Norman, OK 73019
United States
405.325.7127 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ou.edu/directory/stephen-e-henderson

Joseph Thai

University of Oklahoma - College of Law ( email )

300 Timberdell Rd.
Norman, OK 73019
United States
405-325-5269 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ou.edu/faculty/thai.shtml

Paper statistics

Downloads
104
Rank
222,340
Abstract Views
682