NYSBA New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer, Fall 2014, Vol. 7, No.2
4 Pages Posted: 1 Aug 2015 Last revised: 20 Aug 2015
Date Written: September 29, 2014
At last! You have lived with this case for many years, and you are now on the verge of finalizing the terms of a settlement agreement. All the contentious issues have finally been resolved, so you thought, when the defendant leans over the table and says, "Just one more thing. We want you and your client to sign a non-disparagement clause as part of the settlement." Yes, non-disparagement clauses have been frequently used as a controversial reputational shield in high-conflict divorces, sensitive employee terminations and contentious consumer actions. However, barely discussed is whether lawyers are ethically able to suggest or be bound by disparagement clauses. This column will address the ethical considerations that lawyers should consider before suggesting or agreeing to sign a non-disparagement clause.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Greenberg, Elayne E., When the Price of Settlement is Ethically Prohibitive: Non-Disparagement Clauses that Apply to Lawyers (September 29, 2014). NYSBA New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer, Fall 2014, Vol. 7, No.2; St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-0029. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2637440