The Psychology of Patent Protection

59 Pages Posted: 31 Jul 2015 Last revised: 16 Jun 2020

See all articles by Stephanie Plamondon Bair

Stephanie Plamondon Bair

Brigham Young University J. Reuben Clark Law School

Date Written: January 27, 2016

Abstract

This Article offers the first comprehensive assessment of the major justifications for our patent system using a behavioral psychology framework. Applying insights from the behavioral literature that I argue more accurately account for the realities of human action than previous analytical tools, I critically evaluate each of the major justifications for patents — incentive theory, disclosure theory, prospect theory, commercialization theory, patent racing theory, and non-utilitarian theories. I ask whether our current patent system is an effective regime for meeting the stated goals of these accounts. When the answer to this question is no, I again turn to the behavioral literature to provide suggestions for how we might better achieve these goals. The results of this analysis suggest that our current patent system is best justified under the commercialization account. Surprisingly, my analysis also suggests that many of the behaviors and outcomes we hope to encourage through patents might more effectively be accomplished using less socially costly non-financial incentives.

Keywords: patent, psychology, behavioral economics, patent theories, intellectual property

Suggested Citation

Plamondon Bair, Stephanie, The Psychology of Patent Protection (January 27, 2016). 48 Conn. L. Rev. 297 (2015), BYU Law Research Paper No. 16-09, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2637505

Stephanie Plamondon Bair (Contact Author)

Brigham Young University J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )

430 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
175
Abstract Views
1,361
rank
221,601
PlumX Metrics