Participation and Procedure

24 Pages Posted: 31 Jul 2015

See all articles by Alexandra D. Lahav

Alexandra D. Lahav

University of Connecticut - School of Law

Date Written: July 30, 2015

Abstract

How much participation should a procedurally just court system offer litigants? This question has always been especially difficult to answer in complex litigation such as class actions and mass torts because these cases involve so many litigants that it would be impossible for each of them to be afforded the kind of individualized hearing that we associate with the day in court ideal. To address the problem, we need to go back to first principles and ask what purposes participation in litigation is meant to serve. Participation serves two purposes: as a predicate to litigant consent and to engage public reason. This Article, written for the Clifford Symposium honoring Judge Jack Weinstein, argues that the public reason rationale offers the best normative underpinning for participation in large-scale litigation and demonstrates how public reason can be realized through procedural innovations such as those Judge Weinstein has pioneered.

Keywords: mass torts, class actions, Weinstein, civil procedure, jury right, advisory jury

Suggested Citation

Lahav, Alexandra D., Participation and Procedure (July 30, 2015). DePaul Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 2, 2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2637890

Alexandra D. Lahav (Contact Author)

University of Connecticut - School of Law ( email )

65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
400
rank
366,744
PlumX Metrics