Revisiting Eisenberg and Plaintiff Success: State Court Civil Trial and Appellate Outcomes

26 Pages Posted: 3 Aug 2015 Last revised: 29 Sep 2015

See all articles by Michael Heise

Michael Heise

Cornell Law School

Martin T. Wells

Cornell University - Law School

Multiple version iconThere are 3 versions of this paper

Date Written: September 28, 2015

Abstract

Legal cases that reach an appellate outcome are a filtered subset of underlying trials and legal disputes. Selection effects inform much of the case filtering. This makes it difficult to study the legal system by observing the outcomes of appealed cases. Prior research on federal civil cases found a correlation between plaintiff success in pretrial motions and at trial. Our study of state civil cases, however, did not find any significant correlation between a plaintiff's success at trial and in preserving that trial victory on appeal. Important differences between the nature of the relation between pretrial motions and trials and trials and appeals likely contribute to our results. Our results imply that a plaintiff’s decision to pursue litigation to a trial court conclusion is analytically distinct from the plaintiff’s decision to defend an appeal of its trial court win brought by a disgruntled defendant.

Suggested Citation

Heise, Michael and Wells, Martin T., Revisiting Eisenberg and Plaintiff Success: State Court Civil Trial and Appellate Outcomes (September 28, 2015). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-24, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2638846

Michael Heise (Contact Author)

Cornell Law School ( email )

308 Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States
607-255-0069 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)

Martin T. Wells

Cornell University - Law School ( email )

Comstock Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-8801 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
47
Abstract Views
688
PlumX Metrics