Disparate Impact and the Role of Classification and Motivation in Equal Protection Law after Inclusive Communities

50 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2015 Last revised: 25 Sep 2015

Date Written: August 11, 2015

Abstract

At least since the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, disparate impact liability has faced a direct constitutional threat. This paper argues that the Court’s decision this past Term in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., which held that disparate impact liability is available under the Fair Housing Act, has resolved that threat, at least for the time being.

In particular, this paper argues, Inclusive Communities is best read to adopt the understanding of equal protection that Justice Kennedy previously articulated in his pivotal concurrence in the 2007 Parents Involved case — which argued that state actions that do not classify individuals based on their race are not constitutionally suspect simply because they are motivated by the purpose of integrating the races. Applying that understanding, Inclusive Communities makes clear that disparate impact need not surrender to equal protection, but that the Constitution demands some limitations on disparate impact liability. Although the limitations should make a difference at the margins, they are not nearly as severe as some may have feared.

The broader goal of this piece is to offer an account of how the principle that Justice Kennedy articulated in Parents Involved, and that the Court seems to have adopted in Inclusive Communities, fits into prior equal protection doctrine. The piece argues that this interpretation of equal protection represents the most attractive approach consistent with the decided cases. But although the Inclusive Communities approach to equal protection represented the best path available to the Court in light of prior cases, it has substantial drawbacks. In addition to ignoring key normative considerations, the Court’s formalistic focus on the existence or nonexistence of a classification as a trigger for strict scrutiny is likely to prove unstable.

Keywords: Equal Protection, Race, Integration, Disparate Impact

Suggested Citation

Bagenstos, Samuel R., Disparate Impact and the Role of Classification and Motivation in Equal Protection Law after Inclusive Communities (August 11, 2015). Cornell Law Review, Vol. 101, Forthcoming; U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 475. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2642631

Samuel R. Bagenstos (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

HOME PAGE: http://web.law.umich.edu/_FacultyBioPage/facultybiopagenew.asp?ID=411

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
324
Abstract Views
1,581
rank
91,555
PlumX Metrics