Exposing Unaddressed Issues in the OECD's BEPS Project: What About the Roles and Implications of Contract Interpretation Law and Private International Law in the Transfer Pricing Arm's Length Comparability Analysis?

World Tax Journal, 2015 (Volume 7), No 1.

Posted: 13 Aug 2015 Last revised: 12 Aug 2016

Date Written: February 25, 2015

Abstract

Through the BEPS Project, the OECD is currently attempting to address the international tax system’s ongoing problems of base erosion and profit shifting. It aims to do so by introducing additional coordinated measures, while also rethinking and improving existing measures. The purpose of this article is to expose an issue that has not been addressed by the BEPS Project, though it is relevant to the Project’s objectives. This issue is the roles that contract interpretation law and private international law necessarily have in the task of delineating the actual controlled transaction when conducting the transfer pricing arm’s length comparability analysis. The article also explains some of the implications of these roles, and proposes measures for reform to address the potential risks involved.

Keywords: Law, International Tax, Transfer Pricing, Contract, Interpretation, Contractual Interpretation, BEPS, Canada v GlaxoSmithKline, Canada

Suggested Citation

Pichhadze, Amir, Exposing Unaddressed Issues in the OECD's BEPS Project: What About the Roles and Implications of Contract Interpretation Law and Private International Law in the Transfer Pricing Arm's Length Comparability Analysis? (February 25, 2015). World Tax Journal, 2015 (Volume 7), No 1. , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2642883

Amir Pichhadze (Contact Author)

University of Oxford ( email )

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
557
PlumX Metrics