Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser

Constitutional Reasoning in the German Federal Constitutional Court

András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich (eds), Comparative Constitutional Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming

28 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2015  

Michaela Hailbronner

University of Muenster

Stefan Martini

Independent

Date Written: June 25, 2015

Abstract

This article examines the method of constitutional reasoning of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Situating German constitutional jurisprudence in its historical background, it analyses the characteristic types of arguments used in 40 ‘leading cases’ of the German Constitutional Court, including the use of precedents, foreign law and key concepts. The article is part of the CONREASON project, hosted by the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law in Heidelberg (Germany) and by the Institute for Legal Studies of the Centre for Social Sciences at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Budapest (Hungary), coordinated by András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich.

Suggested Citation

Hailbronner, Michaela and Martini, Stefan, Constitutional Reasoning in the German Federal Constitutional Court (June 25, 2015). András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich (eds), Comparative Constitutional Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2643760

Michaela Hailbronner (Contact Author)

University of Muenster ( email )

Schlossplatz 2
Muenster, D-48149
Germany

Stefan Martini

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Paper statistics

Downloads
97
rank
238,615
Abstract Views
281
PlumX