The Contingency of Courts: Changing the Experiences and Logics of Publics’ Role in Court-Based ADR

34 Pages Posted: 21 Aug 2015 Last revised: 9 Feb 2016

Date Written: August 1, 2015

Abstract

Debate exists about how much alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is used in courts and about the metrics by which to evaluate its impact. Yet on two measures — the volume of rulemaking and the privatization of court-based interactions — the results are unambiguous: courts have promulgated hundreds of rules governing ADR, and those rules rarely protect rights of the public to know much about either the processes or the results. Rather, court-based procedural rules are increasingly becoming contract-promoting rules, encouraging parties to conclude disputes without adjudication.

In this essay, in honor of Professor Stephen Subrin, I explore the centrality of “open courts” to judicial legitimacy. Courts provide opportunities for democratic engagements with the production and application of law. The public’s right of access to observe proceedings in courts sustains judicial independence, legitimates public investments in the judiciary, and offers routes to oversight when courts fail to live up to obligations to treat disputants fairly. These constitutional values ought to inform the shape of procedural innovations in courts. Court-based arbitration and court-based settlement programs, like court-based trials, should be subject to regulation insistent on a role for the public.

Keywords: open courts, First Amendment, access to courts, alternative dispute resolution, settlement, arbitration, privatization, democratic engagement

Suggested Citation

Resnik, Judith, The Contingency of Courts: Changing the Experiences and Logics of Publics’ Role in Court-Based ADR (August 1, 2015). Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 15, p. 951, 2015; Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 550. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2643830

Judith Resnik (Contact Author)

Yale University - Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
203-432-1447 (Phone)
203-432-1719 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Abstract Views
423
rank
343,728
PlumX Metrics