Status Motives and Agent-to-Agent Information Sharing: How Evolutionary Psychology Shapes Agents' Responses to Control System Design

42 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2015 Last revised: 12 Nov 2015

See all articles by Jasmijn C. Bol

Jasmijn C. Bol

Tulane University - A.B. Freeman School of Business

Justin Leiby

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Date Written: August 17, 2015

Abstract

The quality of decision making within firms often depends on the willingness of agents to share information with other agents. In two studies, we examine the effects of status motives, i.e., the desire to gain the respect of and deference from others, on information sharing. We investigate information sharing in two different control systems: one in which agents receive incentives to share and one in which agents incur costs to share. We draw on theory from evolutionary psychology to argue that status motives modify agents’ responses to the control systems — specifically, constraining the willingness to share information when agents receive incentives to do so but increasing this willingness when agents incur costs to do so. We discuss the implications of our findings for information sharing, and the implications of applying an evolutionary framework of agent motivation to understand decision making in firms.

Suggested Citation

Bol, Jasmijn C. and Leiby, Justin, Status Motives and Agent-to-Agent Information Sharing: How Evolutionary Psychology Shapes Agents' Responses to Control System Design (August 17, 2015). AAA 2016 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2645804 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2645804

Jasmijn C. Bol (Contact Author)

Tulane University - A.B. Freeman School of Business ( email )

7 McAlister Drive
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States

Justin Leiby

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ( email )

1206 S 6th St
Champaign, IL 61822
United States
2173007825 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
168
Abstract Views
1,229
rank
183,181
PlumX Metrics