Regulation of Emerging Risks

78 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2015 Last revised: 1 Apr 2016

See all articles by Matthew Wansley

Matthew Wansley

Harvard University - Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society

Date Written: August 17, 2015

Abstract

Why has the EPA not regulated fracking? Why has the FDA not regulated e-cigarettes? Why has NHTSA not regulated autonomous vehicles? This Article argues that administrative agencies predictably fail to regulate emerging risks when the political environment for regulation is favorable. The cause is a combination of administrative law and interest group politics. Agencies must satisfy high, initial informational thresholds to regulate, so they postpone rulemaking in the face of uncertainty about the effects of new technologies. But while regulators passively acquire more information, fledgling industries consolidate and become politically entrenched. By the time agencies can justify regulation, the newly entrenched industries have the political capital to thwart them.

This Article offers a prophylactic against this predictable regulatory failure. It defends an experimentalist model of regulation, in which agencies are empowered to impose moratoria on risky emerging technologies while regulators organize experiments to learn about the risks they pose and the means to mitigate them. The agency-coordinated experiments would expedite the promulgation of empirically informed rules. The moratoria would extend the political window for regulatory action and protect the public in the interim. The Article applies this experimentalist model to the regulation of fracking, e-cigarettes, and autonomous vehicles. It also identifies legal strategies for implementing experimental regulation under existing law. It challenges the conventional wisdom that agencies should postpone regulation until they can confidently predict the effects of new risky technologies.

Keywords: regulation, technology, risk

JEL Classification: K23

Suggested Citation

Wansley, Matthew, Regulation of Emerging Risks (August 17, 2015). 69 Vanderbilt Law Review 401 (2016); Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 15-17. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2646316

Matthew Wansley (Contact Author)

Harvard University - Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society ( email )

Harvard Law School
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
197
rank
150,376
Abstract Views
851
PlumX Metrics