Judicial Dialogue on the 1267 Smart Sanctions Regime

33 Pages Posted: 19 Aug 2015 Last revised: 27 Nov 2017

See all articles by Ralph R. A. Janik

Ralph R. A. Janik

University of Vienna - Section for International Law & International Relations; Webster University - Vienna Campus

Date Written: August 18, 2015

Abstract

Ever since the first judicial decisions on the question of implementing the resolutions passed by the Security Council in the wake of combatting terrorism were rendered, the tension between the so-called 1267 sanctions regime and fundamental human rights became all too visible and confronted the lawyer – most of all, the judge(s) – with the unpleasant dilemma to choose sides in the classical liberty or security-dichotomy: obeying the Security Council or looking for legal loopholes, regardless of how fishy they may appear, in order to guarantee the basic human rights for those affected? Case-law on this subject matter shows that judges soon realized that they were not alone in attempting to find a somewhat acceptable way out of this dilemma. Many domestic and international courts have – to varying degrees – proven to be ready and willing to refer to the decisions and the underlying rationale of their counterparts in other jurisdictions. After all, the main reason why judges resort to such a ‘judicial dialogue’ – a legal problem which goes beyond the specific technicalities of a given legal order and which has been raised during the proceedings of various courts – was obviously present and while it may be too emphatic to speak of a triumph of judicial dialogue, it has certainly played a key role in improving (although still not to a satisfying extent) the 1267 sanctions regime.

Keywords: judicial dialogue, international law in domestic courts, human rights law, fair trial, smart sanctions, targeted sanctions, Kadi, ECJ, ECtHR, Nada

Suggested Citation

Janik, Ralph R. A., Judicial Dialogue on the 1267 Smart Sanctions Regime (August 18, 2015). Austrian Review of International and European Law, Vol. 17, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2646578

Ralph R. A. Janik (Contact Author)

University of Vienna - Section for International Law & International Relations ( email )

Schottenbastei 10-16
Vienna, 1010
Austria

Webster University - Vienna Campus ( email )

Berchtoldgase 1
Vienna, 1220
Austria

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
78
rank
295,721
Abstract Views
345
PlumX Metrics