The Language of Administrative Law

Canadian Bar Review, Forthcoming

21 Pages Posted: 20 Aug 2015

See all articles by Paul Daly

Paul Daly

University of Ottawa - Common Law Section

Date Written: August 18, 2015

Abstract

Administrative law has changed radically in its scope and breadth in recent decades. Old analytical frameworks have been cast aside and replaced by more open-textured concepts, such as "legality", "rationality" and "fairness." In demonstrating that administrative decisions are beyond the legal pale, lawyers have resort to various devices: mission statements, labels, terminological exactitude, metaphors and personification.

Although language plays a useful descriptive role in administrative law, by setting out a landscape that can be comfortably viewed and usefully discussed from 20,000 feet, overreliance on these devices obfuscates the inevitably normative task judges have in judicial review cases: deciding and explaining whether intervention would be justifiable or not. Falling back on language may be a coping mechanism for judges, lawyers and academics deprived by the recent administrative law reformations of clear principles around which their work can be organized. In this paper, I demonstrate the limits of language in administrative law, with a view to understanding the role of judicial review more clearly. Descriptive language is often either useless – because it adds nothing but a conclusory label to a conclusion reached on other grounds – or downright dangerous – because it hides judicial value judgements. Administrative lawyers have to think and judges to justify themselves in normative terms. Mission statements, labels, terminological exactitude, metaphors and personification are descriptive devices better left to publishing houses.

This is an early draft that will be published in a volume of the Canadian Bar Review in honour of former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Louis LeBel.

Keywords: administrative law, judicial review of administrative action, procedural fairness, substantive review, hard look review, anxious scrutiny, bias, reasonableness, reasonable observer, metaphor, mission statement, legality, rationality, fairness, abuse of power, ultra vires

Suggested Citation

Daly, Paul, The Language of Administrative Law (August 18, 2015). Canadian Bar Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2646706 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2646706

Paul Daly (Contact Author)

University of Ottawa - Common Law Section ( email )

57 Louis Pasteur Street
Ottawa, K1N 6N5
Canada

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
384
Abstract Views
1,695
rank
82,398
PlumX Metrics