Research & Politics (2016 Forthcoming)
30 Pages Posted: 26 Aug 2015 Last revised: 9 Feb 2016
Date Written: Feburary 8, 2016
The human rights movement has spent considerable energy developing and promoting the adoption of both international and domestic legal prohibitions against torture. Empirical scholarship testing the effectiveness of these prohibitions using observational data, however, has produced mixed results. In this paper, we explore one possible mechanism through which these prohibitions may be effective: dampening public support for torture. Specifically, we conducted a survey experiment to explore the impact of international and constitutional law on public support for torture. We found that a bare majority of respondents in our control group support the use of torture, and that presenting respondents with arguments that this practice violates international law or constitutional law did not produce a statistically significant decrease in support. These findings are consistent with prior research suggesting, even in democracies, that legal prohibitions on torture have been ineffective.
Keywords: Human Rights; Torture; International Law; Constitutional Law; Survey Experiment; Public Opinion
JEL Classification: K100
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Chilton, Adam S. and Versteeg, Mila, International Law, Constitutional Law, and Public Support for Torture (Feburary 8, 2016). Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 22; Research & Politics (2016 Forthcoming); Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 22; University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 733. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2650929 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2650929