Not Available for Download

The Semiotics of Labor Law, Trade Unions and Work in East Asia: International 'Labor Standards' in the Mirror of Culture?

Emory International Law Review, Forthcoming

Posted: 4 May 2001  

Harry G. Hutchison

Centre for the Study of Law & Public Policy at Oxford; Regent University - School of Law

Abstract

This review essay looks at Vai Io Lo's book, Law and Industrial Relations: China and Japan after World War II (Kluwer) as an initial starting point for a conversation about largely western attempts to impose "basic labor rights" which some see as a fundamental human and civil right on countries which fail to share western culture and perhaps western cultural values.

The author examines the cultural background of both Japan and China, the notion of culture itself derived at least in part from the insights of Terry Eagleton and the conclusive skepticism of Jacques Elllul about the notion of human progress to challenge the prevailing conventional wisdom about the necessity of international labor standards. The author argues that labor standards, however desirable, may simply be a highly contingent principle that suits the preferences of those who disagree with the labor policies of other countries. Perforce, the failure of Japan and China to fully embrace western labor standards is not only laudable, but may in the light of their culture be justifiable.

Notes: This is a description of the paper and not the actual abstract.

JEL Classification: K1, K3, J4

Suggested Citation

Hutchison, Harry G., The Semiotics of Labor Law, Trade Unions and Work in East Asia: International 'Labor Standards' in the Mirror of Culture?. Emory International Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=265131

Harry G. Hutchison (Contact Author)

Centre for the Study of Law & Public Policy at Oxford

Belsyre Court, 57 Woodstock Road
Oxford 0X2 6HJ
United Kingdom

Regent University - School of Law ( email )

1000 Regent University Drive
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
United States

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
567