Arbitration in Southern Europe: Insights from a Large-Scale Empirical Study

26 The American Review of International Arbitration 187-268 (2015)

82 Pages Posted: 29 Aug 2015

See all articles by Tony Cole

Tony Cole

University of Leicester Law School

Pietro Ortolani

Radboud University

Barbara Alicja Warwas

The Hague University of Applied Sciences

Date Written: August 27, 2015

Abstract

When the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament commissioned the authors of this article, along with other members of the Brunel Centre for the Study of Arbitration and Cross-Border Investment, to undertake a study of the “Legal Instruments and Practice of Arbitration across the EU”, it was decided that a central platform of that Study should be large-scale empirical research dedicated to identifying the realities of arbitral practice in each of the States in the European Union plus Switzerland.

This empirical research took the form of a Survey of arbitration practitioners across the European Union and Switzerland, consisting of 95 questions, and addressing such diverse topics as the backgrounds of arbitration practitioners, the procedures used in the arbitrations in which respondents had been involved, the considerations important for recommending arbitration and for selecting an arbitrator, and environmental questions such as the attitude of judges towards arbitration and the desirability of action by the European Union to harmonize arbitration law across the European Union.

The present article reports on and discusses the results of this Survey with respect to six States collectively described here as constituting “Southern Europe”: Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Malta, Portugal and Spain. While these States share an obvious geographic proximity, it is important to emphasize that the decision to collect them into a single article was made not just on this geographic basis, but also due to certain cultural and legal elements shared by these States that might be thought to impact on local arbitral practice.

The goal of this article is not merely to report the results of the Survey, but is instead to use the results of the Survey, interpreted in the light of the additional information developed in the course of the Study, to generate a picture of arbitration in each of these States. In this way the article seeks to deviate from the norm of concentration upon elite international arbitration practice, in order to provide important new information on the realities of and variations that exist in the practice of arbitration across Southern Europe. Recognizing and appreciating this reality of diversity provides an important foundation for enriching the academic study of arbitration beyond this single article and these six States, moving such study away from an exclusive focus on elite arbitral practice, towards an appreciation of the significant variations that do indeed often characterize the reality of arbitration around the world.

Suggested Citation

Cole, Tony and Ortolani, Pietro and Warwas, Barbara Alicja, Arbitration in Southern Europe: Insights from a Large-Scale Empirical Study (August 27, 2015). 26 The American Review of International Arbitration 187-268 (2015), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2652298

Tony Cole (Contact Author)

University of Leicester Law School ( email )

University Road
Leicester LE1 7RH, LE1 7RH
United Kingdom

Pietro Ortolani

Radboud University ( email )

Montessorilaan 10
Nijmegen
Netherlands

Barbara Alicja Warwas

The Hague University of Applied Sciences ( email )

Johana Westerdijkplein 75
The Hague, Zuid Holland 2521 EN
Netherlands

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
348
Abstract Views
1,363
rank
95,236
PlumX Metrics