Explaining the Blue Shift in Election Canvassing

47 Pages Posted: 1 Sep 2015 Last revised: 12 Sep 2015

See all articles by Edward B. Foley

Edward B. Foley

Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law; Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, Program in Law & Public Policy

Charles Stewart III

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Political Science

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: August 28, 2015

Abstract

We conduct statistical analysis of a phenomenon recently identified by Foley (2013), the rise in the number of votes counted after Election Day (“overtime votes”) and the growing tendency of these votes to disproportionately favor Democrats in presidential elections (the “blue shift.”) We provide a historical description of these two time series, from 1948 to 2012, and establish that the timing of the persistent growth in the blue-shifted overtime vote began with the 2004 election. While some of the interstate variability in these time series is accounted for by regional factors (e.g., a lag in news travelling to New York), changes in the time series are broadly consistent with changes in electoral practices, especially in recent years.

We perform statistical analysis to understand better interstate variability in the overtime vote and the blue shift in the 2012 presidential election. We discover that variation in the size of the overtime vote is associated with the number of provisional ballots, but not the number of absentee/mail ballots; variation in the relative size of the blue shift is positively associated with the number of provisional ballots and with the Democratic partisanship of the states. We also perform an analysis of the overtime vote in seven statewide contests in Virginia, using that state’s change log as evidence. We find a tendency of provisional ballots to persistently favor Democrats in these races, whereas other sources of votes accounted for after Election Day do not persistently favor Democrats in that state.

We conclude the paper by suggesting how the analysis offered here might be expanded in future work.

Suggested Citation

Foley, Edward B. and Stewart III, Charles, Explaining the Blue Shift in Election Canvassing (August 28, 2015). MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2015-21, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2653456 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2653456

Edward B. Foley

Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )

55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
614-292-4288 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://moritzlaw.osu.edu/faculty/edward-b-foley/

Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, Program in Law & Public Policy

United States

Charles Stewart III (Contact Author)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Political Science ( email )

77 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02139
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
598
Abstract Views
7,913
Rank
24,584
PlumX Metrics