Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The 'Nature' of Legal Dispute Bargaining

17 Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (2016 Forthcoming)

U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-27

26 Pages Posted: 2 Sep 2015 Last revised: 12 Jan 2016

Robert Condlin

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law

Date Written: August 31, 2015

Abstract

The longstanding debate over the relative merits of adversarial and communitarian theories of legal dispute bargaining has been in somewhat of a holding pattern for several years, but recent research in the field of cognitive neuroscience may break the logjam. Laboratory experiments and case studies in that field have shown how dispositions and capacities for social cooperation inherited from natural selection and evolution predispose humans to configure disputing as a mixture of argument over factual reality, disagreement over the interpretation of normative standards, and a search for impartial resolutions that protect the interests of everyone involved equally. This neurobiological inheritance can be difficult to appreciate, resist, and control, but it is something all dispute bargaining theory, adversarial and communitarian alike, must take into account. Theories that ignore it are limited to telling only part of the dispute bargaining story.

Keywords: conflict resolution, social cooperation, tribal, moral mind, meta-moral

Suggested Citation

Condlin, Robert, The 'Nature' of Legal Dispute Bargaining (August 31, 2015). 17 Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (2016 Forthcoming); U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-27. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2653904

Robert J. Condlin (Contact Author)

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law ( email )

500 West Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201-1786
United States
410-706-3719 (Phone)
410-706-2184 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: www.law.umaryland.edu

Paper statistics

Downloads
57
Rank
311,323
Abstract Views
431