Religion Is Not a Basis for Harming Others

27 Pages Posted: 3 Sep 2015 Last revised: 13 Aug 2017

Erwin Chemerinsky

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

Michele Goodwin

University of California, Irvine School of Law

Date Written: September 1, 2015

Abstract

Increasingly, people are claiming that practicing their religion gives them a right to inflict injuries on others. Court clerks assert their religion gives them a right to refuse to give marriage licenses to same sex couples. Businesses claim that their owners’ religious beliefs are a basis for refusing to provide services at same sex weddings. Employers demand the right to deny insurance coverage to employees for contraceptives. Doctors maintain that they may refuse to provide assisted reproductive technology services to single women, lesbians, and same sex couples. Pharmacists want the right to not fill prescriptions that they see as violating their religious beliefs. Parents claim a religious right to restrict their children from receiving medical care, opting instead for prayer.

Our thesis is that free exercise of religion – whether pursuant to the Constitution or a statute – does not provide a right to inflict injuries on others. One person’s freedom ends when another person will get hurt. As we have written about in the contexts of vaccinations, some states even provide religious exemptions for parents who wish to withhold this important, basic preventative treatment from their children, placing not only their kids, but also others at risk. The use of religion as a means to inflict harm others in these ways is not only disconcerting, but problematic for law and society.

In this Review Essay we take up Dr. Paul Offit’s book, Bad Faith, where he argues that children are suffering and dying because of their parents’ religious beliefs. We place this discussion in a more explicit legal framework. Our position is not anti-religion and it does not deprive free exercise of religion of meaning. We emphasize that people can believe what they want, worship as they chose, and follow their religious precepts – until and unless this would hurt someone else. We argue that parents have no right to inflict suffering or death on their children in the name of religion.

Suggested Citation

Chemerinsky, Erwin and Goodwin, Michele, Religion Is Not a Basis for Harming Others (September 1, 2015). Georgetown Law Journal, Vol.105, No.5, June, 2015/16 ; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2015-78. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2654487

Erwin Chemerinsky

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )

215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

HOME PAGE: https://www.law.berkeley.edu/our-faculty/faculty-profiles/erwin-chemerinsky/

Michele Goodwin (Contact Author)

University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )

401 E. Peltason Dr.
Ste. 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
287
rank
97,448
Abstract Views
1,888
PlumX