A Giant Step Backwards? Opinion 2/13 on the EU's Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights

17 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2015

See all articles by Jed Odermatt

Jed Odermatt

Centre of Excellence for International Courts (iCourts); The City Law School

Date Written: February 24, 2015

Abstract

On 18 December 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered Opinion 2/13 on whether the Draft Agreement on the European Union’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights is compatible with EU law. The Court found that the Agreement did not sufficiently take into account the specific nature of the European Union, and that it in many ways violated the ‘autonomy’ of the EU legal order. This Working Paper examines the Court’s findings in Opinion 2/13 and the reasons why it rejected the draft Accession Agreement. It focuses on the most troubling finding: that that the Strasbourg Court’s jurisdiction over the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy in the fails to have regard to the specific features of EU law. The Working Paper concludes by looking at the next steps that could be taken in order for the EU to accede to the Convention.

Keywords: Opinion 2/13, European Union, European Convention on Human Rights, Court of Justice of the European Union, Human Rights, Autonomy

Suggested Citation

Odermatt, Jed and Odermatt, Jed, A Giant Step Backwards? Opinion 2/13 on the EU's Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights (February 24, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2654633 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2654633

Jed Odermatt (Contact Author)

The City Law School ( email )

Northampton Square
London, EC1V OHB
United Kingdom
EC1V 0HB (Fax)

Centre of Excellence for International Courts (iCourts) ( email )

Nørregade 10
Copenhagen, København DK-1165
Denmark

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
239
Abstract Views
1,056
rank
180,075
PlumX Metrics