The Myth of Traffic-Responsive Signal Control: Why Common Sense Does Not Always Make Sense.
16 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2015
Date Written: July 2015
Abstract
Intuitively, one is inclined to think that traffic-responsive signal control is the most efficient control policy. In this paper, however, we show that for an intersection of two routes connecting one origin-destination pair where only one route is subject to congestion, anticipatory signal control performs better than traffic-responsive signal control. Furthermore, the unfolded logic behind this result suggests that the superiority of anticipatory signal control also extends to other networks.
Keywords: anticipatory control, Stackelberg game, traffic-responsive control
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Evers, Ruth and Proost, Stef V., The Myth of Traffic-Responsive Signal Control: Why Common Sense Does Not Always Make Sense. (July 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2655586 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2655586
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN