Huawei v ZTE: Established Case Law and Open Issues after ECJ's Judgment
3 Pages Posted: 5 Sep 2015
Date Written: September 3, 2015
Abstract
The referring Court had raised the question whether an action for infringement brought by a FRAND-encumbered SEP holder against an undertaking which manufactures products in accordance with that standard constitutes an abuse of a dominant position.
The ECJ’s judgment had been long awaited as it was expected to strike a balance among two different approaches.
Keywords: antitrust, patents, IP, European Court of Justice, ECJ, Standard essential patents, Huawei
JEL Classification: K21
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Lo Bue, Marco, Huawei v ZTE: Established Case Law and Open Issues after ECJ's Judgment (September 3, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2656056 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2656056
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.
