Miranda 2.0

74 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2015  

Date Written: September 4, 2015

Abstract

Fifty years after Miranda v. Arizona, significant numbers of innocent suspects are falsely confessing to crimes while subject to police custodial interrogation. Critics on the left and right have proposed reforms to Miranda, but few such proposals are appropriately targeted to the problem of false confessions. Using rigorous psychological evidence of the causes of false confessions, this article analyzes the range of proposals and develops a realistic set of reforms directed specifically at this foundational challenge to the justice system. Miranda 2.0 is long overdue; it should require: warning suspects how long they can be interrogated for; delivering the warnings via a non-police intermediary, preferably a pre-approved audio-visual recording; recording all interrogations; varying the strength of warnings according to characteristics that make suspects differently susceptible; and reforming and simplifying the rules of waiver. This article establishes why each of these proposals most effectively combats the problem of false confessions and how they can be realistically implemented, without overly burdening police efficiency and efficacy.

Keywords: Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Miranda, Interrogation, False Confesssion, Police, Innocence, Psychology

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Jacobi, Tonja, Miranda 2.0 (September 4, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2656405 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2656405

Tonja Jacobi (Contact Author)

Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
137
Rank
172,561
Abstract Views
596