Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2657808
 


 



The Effects of Income Transparency on Well-Being: Evidence from a Natural Experiment


Ricardo Perez-Truglia


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

February 10, 2016


Abstract:     
In 2001, Norwegian tax records became easily accessible online, allowing individuals to observe the incomes of others. Because of self-image and social-image concerns, higher income transparency can increase the differences in well-being between rich and poor. We test this hypothesis using survey data from 1985-2013. We identify the causal effect of income transparency on subjective well-being by using differences-in-differences, triple-differences, and event-study analyses. We find that higher income transparency increased the happiness gap between rich and poor by 29% and the life satisfaction gap by 21%. Additionally, higher income transparency corrected misperceptions about the income distribution and changed preferences for redistribution. Last, we use the estimates for back-of-the-envelope calculations of the value of self-image and social-image.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: self-image, social-image, happiness, life satisfaction, income comparisons, relative income, disclosure policy

JEL Classification: D03, D60, D31, D80, I31, K34, Z10


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 9, 2015 ; Last revised: February 20, 2016

Suggested Citation

Perez-Truglia, Ricardo, The Effects of Income Transparency on Well-Being: Evidence from a Natural Experiment (February 10, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2657808 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2657808

Contact Information

Ricardo Perez-Truglia (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ( email )
405 Hilgard Avenue
Box 951361
Los Angeles, CA 90095
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/global-economics-and-management/perez-truglia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,681
Downloads: 549
Download Rank: 38,185
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper