Benchmarking

Theoretical Economics, Forthcoming

24 Pages Posted: 9 Sep 2015 Last revised: 14 Oct 2017

Christopher P. Chambers

Georgetown University - Department of Economics

Alan D. Miller

University of Haifa - Faculty of Law; University of Haifa - Department of Economics

Date Written: Oct 5, 2017

Abstract

We introduce a theory of ranking sets of accomplishments in the presence of objectively incomparable marginal contributions (apples and oranges). Our theory recommends benchmarking, a method under which an individual is deemed more accomplished than another if and only if she has achieved more benchmarks, or important accomplishments. We show that benchmark rules are characterized by four axioms: transitivity, monotonicity, incomparability of marginal gains, and incomparability of marginal losses. The latter two properties are local, and hence we endogenously derive a concept of a global, objective good, which we call a benchmark.

Keywords: Benchmarking, Axioms, Measurement, Apples and Oranges, Incompleteness, Closure Operator, Homomorphisms

JEL Classification: A10, C71, D63

Suggested Citation

Chambers, Christopher P. and Miller, Alan D., Benchmarking (Oct 5, 2017). Theoretical Economics, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2658285 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2658285

Christopher P. Chambers

Georgetown University - Department of Economics ( email )

Washington, DC 20057
United States

Alan D. Miller (Contact Author)

University of Haifa - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Carmel
Haifa, 31905
Israel
+972-52-503-9259 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://econ.haifa.ac.il/~admiller

University of Haifa - Department of Economics ( email )

Haifa 31905
Israel
+972-52-503-9259 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://econ.haifa.ac.il/~admiller

Register to support our free research

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
42
Abstract Views
486
PlumX