Politics of Nonenforcement

33 Pages Posted: 10 Sep 2015

See all articles by Zachary Price

Zachary Price

University of California Hastings College of the Law

Date Written: September 9, 2015


Constitutional controversies over executive nonenforcement have emerged as a major theme of the Obama Presidency. Yet similar controversies arose in other recent administrations — and in past debates, the two political parties’ positions on this issue were often reversed. Building on previous work addressing constitutional principles that properly govern executive enforcement discretion, this brief symposium contribution reflects on these principles in light of our current, highly polarized politics. It does so in three ways. First, Part I provides historical perspective on current debates by describing major enforcement-related controversies from the Reagan and George W. Bush Administrations. Second, Part II proposes criteria for assessing how faithful an agency’s enforcement policy is to the agency’s underlying statutory mandate. As Part II explains, several qualities — most importantly, transparency and clarity — that are generally considered virtues in administrative law are often counterproductive in the enforcement context. Finally, Part III tentatively explores possible practical, political implications of weakening norms of executive enforcement obligation.

Suggested Citation

Price, Zachary, Politics of Nonenforcement (September 9, 2015). Case Western Reserve Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 4, 2015; UC Hastings Research Paper No. 153. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2658462

Zachary Price (Contact Author)

University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )

200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics