Regulatory Competition in Global Financial Markets – The Case for a Special Resolution Regime

Annals of Corporate Governance, Forthcoming

Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No 49/2015

51 Pages Posted: 13 Sep 2015 Last revised: 11 May 2016

See all articles by Wolf-Georg Ringe

Wolf-Georg Ringe

University of Hamburg - Institute of Law & Economics; University of Oxford - Faculty of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Date Written: January 15, 2016


Regulatory arbitrage in financial markets refers to a number of strategies that market participants use to avoid the reach of regulation, in particular by virtue of shifting trading abroad or else relocating activities or operations of financial institutions to other jurisdictions. Where this happens, such arbitrage can trigger regulatory competition between jurisdictions that may respond to the relocation of financial services (or threats to relocate) by moderating their regulatory standards.

This paper develops a framework for the assessment of both phenomena in the context of financial regulation and assesses their merits. I argue that regulatory competition has many advantages over alternative global approaches, notably international harmonization of regulation, by offering a dynamic process for the discovery of efficient regulatory standards. However, the risk is that countries lower their standards solely to attract businesses and thereby impose externalities on the worldwide financial market by undermining financial stability as a global public good.

Policymakers worldwide are experimenting with remedies to respond to the phenomenon. I introduce the importance of an effective special resolution regime for financial institutions to the discussion. I argue that, within limits, a credible, worldwide resolution scheme can effectively contribute to reducing the dilemma. Its main benefit would be to tackle the problem of financial stability caused by systemically important financial institutions’ excessive risk-taking. If such risk-taking would be judged by market discipline instead of posing a risk to global financial stability, the main downside of regulatory competition could be restrained. Within the boundaries of such a system, competition could then operate and contribute to a market-led design of financial regulation.

Keywords: regulatory arbitrage, regulatory competition, financial stability, special resolution

JEL Classification: G21, G28, K22

Suggested Citation

Ringe, Wolf-Georg, Regulatory Competition in Global Financial Markets – The Case for a Special Resolution Regime (January 15, 2016). Annals of Corporate Governance, Forthcoming, Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No 49/2015, Available at SSRN: or

Wolf-Georg Ringe (Contact Author)

University of Hamburg - Institute of Law & Economics ( email )

Johnsallee 35
Hamburg, 20148
+49 40 42838 7787 (Phone)
+49 40 42838 6794 (Fax)


University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

St Cross Building
St Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UL
United Kingdom


European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) ( email )

c/o the Royal Academies of Belgium
Rue Ducale 1 Hertogsstraat
1000 Brussels


Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics