Applying Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Restrictions

27 Pages Posted: 16 Sep 2015 Last revised: 30 Nov 2016

See all articles by Jonas Anderson

Jonas Anderson

American University - Washington College of Law

Date Written: 2015

Abstract

The US Supreme Court’s difficulty in promulgating a standard for patent-eligibility has not gone unnoticed in the academy. Hundreds of academic conferences, including this one, have been devoted to the topic. The goal of this Article is not to solve the seemingly intractable problem of patent-eligibility doctrine. The goal of this Article is rather more modest. Instead of normatively assessing patent-eligible subject matter doctrine, this Article seeks to identify which foundational theories of patent-eligible subject matter can most readily be applied by courts and the US Patent and Trademark Office via Section 101. In doing so, this Article categorizes the various innovation theories that scholars have applied to Section 101 and analyzes whether the resulting doctrines can be predictably applied by the institutions involved in patent law. Appreciating the applicability of patent-eligible subject matter theories can assist the Supreme Court in shaping doctrine that best achieves the policy goals underlying those theories.

Keywords: Federal Circuit, PTO, Patent Law, Patentable Subject Matter, 35 USC 101

Suggested Citation

Anderson, Jonas, Applying Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Restrictions (2015). 17 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law 267 (2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2661021

Jonas Anderson (Contact Author)

American University - Washington College of Law ( email )

4300 Nebraska Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20016
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
71
Abstract Views
499
rank
321,330
PlumX Metrics