Supreme Disgorgement

28 Pages Posted: 17 Sep 2015 Last revised: 27 Mar 2017

See all articles by Caprice L. Roberts

Caprice L. Roberts

The George Washington University Law School

Date Written: July 17, 2015

Abstract

Disgorgement of defendant’s wrongful gains is an ancient remedy. It applies across a spectrum of contexts from trademark infringement to fiduciary duties, from common law to statutes, from public to private law. This remedy is not regarded as quintessential in American contract law. That is changing. My earlier work — as cited by the Supreme Court — predicted this shift based upon a new rule in the Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. The rule operationalizes disgorgement of profits for opportunistic breaches of contract. This new conceptualization of precedent authorizes a gain-based remedy that exceeds the compensation goals of contract law’s preferred, default remedy of expectancy damages.

This remedy is bold and will affect the law of contracts, remedies, and restitution. I show, in a companion article, how state and federal courts resolve novel disgorgement requests for breach of contract claims. In the instant article, I examine an unusual endorsement of disgorgement by the Supreme Court sitting in original jurisdiction over the breach of a water-rights compact between states. Harnessing broad powers of equity jurisdiction, the Court adopts a $1.8 million disgorgement award exceeding compensation. It strips part of defendant’s profits and stacks onto a compensatory award for losses sustained. Relying on the Restatement (much to Justice Scalia’s chagrin), the Court permits disgorgement to deter defendant’s knowingly exposing plaintiff to a substantial risk of breach. This provocative application offers a lens through which to explore broader questions: whether, when, and how the disgorgement remedy should apply to breach of contracts, whether public or private. I conclude that disgorgement is a valuable remedy for breach of contract, but judges must exercise reasoned discretion in application to proper facts and restraint in tying the measurement to causation. I also maintain that the inclusion of disgorgement in the stable of remedies broadens the scope of contract law to include inquiries and features typically associated with tort law. As in all of my remedies work, I argue remedies shape right — here: granting the remedy of disgorgement expands the shape of the underlying contract right in both public and private law.

Keywords: contract, disgorgement, remedy, profit, restitution, unjust enrichment, restatement, public law, private law

Suggested Citation

Roberts, Caprice L., Supreme Disgorgement (July 17, 2015). 68 Florida Law Review 1413 (2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2661109

Caprice L. Roberts (Contact Author)

The George Washington University Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
200
Abstract Views
1,209
rank
149,245
PlumX Metrics