Against the Grain: Therapeutic Judging in a Traditional Family Court

Lens, V. (2015). Against the grain: Therapeutic judging in a traditional Family Court. Law & Social Inquiry. DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12153

18 Pages Posted: 17 Sep 2015

See all articles by Vicki Lens

Vicki Lens

Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College, CUNY

Date Written: September 16, 2015

Abstract

The last several decades has seen a proliferation of specialized courts, including within the Family Court system, that deviate from the adversarial model, and which rely on therapeutic jurisprudence and other problem-solving techniques. Whether and how traditional family courts can incorporate the best practices of these specialized courts is a largely understudied area. Drawing from ethnographic observations of a traditional urban family court, this study finds that some judges are able to transform non-therapeutic courtrooms into therapeutic ones despite obstacles. These “against the grain” actors, who act contrary to the institution’s dominant norms and practices, demonstrate how therapeutic jurisprudence and other problem solving techniques can be utilized in traditional courtrooms.

Keywords: Therapeutic jurisprudence, Family Court, child welfare

Suggested Citation

Lens, Vicki, Against the Grain: Therapeutic Judging in a Traditional Family Court (September 16, 2015). Lens, V. (2015). Against the grain: Therapeutic judging in a traditional Family Court. Law & Social Inquiry. DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12153, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2661684

Vicki Lens (Contact Author)

Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College, CUNY ( email )

2180 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10035
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
101
Abstract Views
593
rank
309,613
PlumX Metrics