Victim Impact Statements, Sentencing and Contemporary Standards of Fairness in the Courtroom

Wilson and Ross (eds), Crime, Victims and Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015

29 Pages Posted: 22 Sep 2015

See all articles by Tracey Booth

Tracey Booth

University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Law

Date Written: March 8, 2015

Abstract

The inclusion of victims and their victim impact statements (VISs) in sentencing modifies the adversarial sentencing hearing in order to reflect shifts in community sensibilities and expectations of fairness in legal proceedings. Drawing on findings from a recent qualitative study of victim participation in sentencing hearings in the New South Wales Supreme Court, this chapter explores the challenges generated by victim participation and the emotional nature of victim impact evidence for the sentencing judge. It considers how judges can respond to the victims’ interests in a manner designed to enhance the fairness of proceedings for victims while not jeopardising the offender’s entitlement to a fair hearing. Ultimately, fairness to victims in this context is more than an entitlement to submit a VIS. Fairness involves meeting a range of procedural conditions in relation to victims including: treating victims with dignity and giving them appropriate space and time to present their statements; keep victims informed where appropriate; and afford victims due recognition as a participant.

Keywords: victim impact statements, procedural fairness, judging, sentencing

Suggested Citation

Booth, Tracey P., Victim Impact Statements, Sentencing and Contemporary Standards of Fairness in the Courtroom (March 8, 2015). Wilson and Ross (eds), Crime, Victims and Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2663861

Tracey P. Booth (Contact Author)

University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Law ( email )

Sydney
Australia

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
78
Abstract Views
465
rank
336,857
PlumX Metrics