State-State Dispute Settlement Under the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

in Tania Voon (ed), Trade Liberalisation and International Co-operation: A Legal Analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (Edward Elgar, 2013) 156–178

23 Pages Posted: 28 Sep 2015

See all articles by Andrew D. Mitchell

Andrew D. Mitchell

University of Melbourne - Law School

James Munro

University of Melbourne - Melbourne Law School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

Most modern preferential trade agreements (PTAs) contain formal state– state dispute settlement mechanisms, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) will be no exception. The addition of Mexico and Canada to the TPP negotiations brings the total number of TPP parties to 11, encompassing Australia, New Zealand, the United States, Peru, Chile, Brunei, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam. This chapter discusses a number of special legal issues facing the TPP parties as they seek to design a well-functioning dispute settlement mechanism to resolve their disputes under the TPP.

First, we discuss the implications of multiple overlapping trade treaties between various subsets of TPP parties, each containing their own dispute settlement systems, which raises questions in relation to conflicts of norms and conflicts of jurisdiction. Second, we consider the rules of interpretation that will be used by tribunals convened under the TPP to construe its terms and settle disputes, including a potential role for the jurisprudence of the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system.

Although the TPP parties have not released a draft text of their dispute settlement mechanism, we draw on their rich body of precedents under past PTAs and evaluate their effectiveness in addressing these special legal issues. We find a remarkable degree of diversity and inconsistency in TPP parties’ past practices, with some precedents substantially more effective than others in resolving particular legal problems.

Keywords: preferential trade agreement, Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, state-state dispute settlement

Suggested Citation

Mitchell, Andrew D. and Munro, James, State-State Dispute Settlement Under the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (2013). in Tania Voon (ed), Trade Liberalisation and International Co-operation: A Legal Analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (Edward Elgar, 2013) 156–178. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2664934

Andrew D. Mitchell (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne - Law School ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Victoria, Victoria 3010
Australia
+61383441098 (Phone)
+61393472392 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/staff/Andrew%20Mitchell

James Munro

University of Melbourne - Melbourne Law School ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Melbourne, Victoria 3010
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
79
Abstract Views
473
rank
109,579
PlumX Metrics