Unfair Methods of Competition after the 2015 Commission Statement

13 Pages Posted: 24 Sep 2015 Last revised: 20 Oct 2015

See all articles by Joshua D. Wright

Joshua D. Wright

Lodestar Law and Economics

Angela Diveley

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Date Written: September 23, 2015


On August 13, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued a statement describing the standard the agency applies when enforcing its “standalone” unfair methods of competition authority pursuant to Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (the “Section 5 Statement”) – a development 101 years in the making. The Section 5 Statement provides the Commission with an important tool to fulfill its purpose of contributing meaningfully to US competition law and policy. Whereas the Commission’s standalone Section 5 authority provided the agency with potentially unbounded authority to prohibit any conduct the majority of the Commission deemed unpalatable – the Section 5 Statement clarifies that it views this authority as limited to economic welfare as understood under the Sherman and Clayton Acts. The Commission's commitment to analyzing conduct under Section 5 as it would under the traditional antitrust laws provides practitioners with the ability to counsel clients as to the contours of Section 5. Furthermore, the Section 5 Statement articulates a relationship between Section 5 and the traditional antitrust laws, as the Commission acknowledges it should refrain from exercising its Section 5 authority where the traditional antitrust laws are sufficient to address the conduct. We intend this article to provide insight from our perspective, as individuals involved in the creation of the Statement, and with the hopes that it will prove useful to those seeking to understand it and how it will and should be applied by courts and agencies.

Keywords: Section 5, FTC, antitrust, patent holdup, Google, Intel, invitations to collude, Federal Trade Commission, administrative agencies

JEL Classification: L4, L5

Suggested Citation

Wright, Joshua D. and Diveley, Angela, Unfair Methods of Competition after the 2015 Commission Statement (September 23, 2015). The Antitrust Source (October 2015), George Mason Legal Studies Research Paper No. LS 15-25, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 15-39, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2664953

Joshua D. Wright (Contact Author)

Lodestar Law and Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 751
Mclean, VA 22101
United States

Angela Diveley

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP ( email )

Washington, DC
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics