Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Accounting for Research Quality: Research Audits and the Journal Rankings Debate

21 Pages Posted: 28 Sep 2015  

Michael Rowlinson

Queen Mary, University of London

Charles Harvey

Newcastle University (UK) - Business School

Aidan Kelly

University of London - Goldsmiths College

Huw Morris

Manchester Metropolitan University

Emanuela Todeva

St. Mary's University; Business Clusters, Networks and Economic Development

Date Written: February 2015

Abstract

The question of whether and how research quality should be measured, and the consequences of research audits such as the UK's Research Excellence Framework (REF) – formerly the RAE – are considered in relation to the role of journal ratings such as the Association of Business Schools Academic Journal Quality Guide (the ABS Guide). Criticism of the ABS Guide has distracted attention from the results of successive RAEs, where the panel for Business and Management has been one of the most selective in its allocation of the highest grades, especially when compared with the neighbouring field of Economics. If the ABS Guide had been used to grade outputs submitted for Business and Management in the RAE 2008 then many more outputs would have received the highest grades, especially in accounting where outputs from journals such as Critical Perspectives on Accounting, which are highly rated in the ABS Guide, appear to have been downgraded by the RAE panel. The alleged bias against accounting in the ABS Guide rests on a particular interpretation of citation impact factors for journals, and a narrow definition of subject fields.

With an estimated ratio of 71 full time students per research active faculty member in UK business schools, it may be time to consider a more appropriate, inclusive, and economical form of ranking for research in business and management.

Keywords: Critical; Accounting journals; Journal rankings; Research audit; United Kingdom

JEL Classification: A20, A29, B29, M40, M41, M49

Suggested Citation

Rowlinson, Michael and Harvey, Charles and Kelly, Aidan and Morris, Huw and Todeva, Emanuela, Accounting for Research Quality: Research Audits and the Journal Rankings Debate (February 2015). Critical Perspectives on Accouting, Vol. 26, No. pp. 2-22, 2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2666142

Michael Rowlinson (Contact Author)

Queen Mary, University of London ( email )

Mile End Road
London, London E1 4NS
United Kingdom

Charles Harvey

Newcastle University (UK) - Business School ( email )

Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU
United Kingdom

Aidan Kelly

University of London - Goldsmiths College ( email )

Lewisham Way
New Cross, SE14 6NW
United Kingdom

Huw Morris

Manchester Metropolitan University ( email )

All Saints
Manchester, M15 6BH
United Kingdom

Emanuela Todeva

St. Mary's University ( email )

Waldegrave Rd
Twickenham, TW1 4SX
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.bcned.co.uk/

Business Clusters, Networks and Economic Development ( email )

London
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.bcned.co.uk

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Rank
325,371
Abstract Views
320