A Behavioral Model of Forecasting: Naive Statistics on Mental Samples

Forthcoming in Management Science, DOI.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2537

Posted: 29 Sep 2015 Last revised: 3 Nov 2016

See all articles by Jordan Tong

Jordan Tong

Wisconsin School of Business

Daniel Feiler

Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth

Date Written: March 20, 2016


Most operations models assume individuals make decisions based on a perfect understanding of random variables or stochastic processes. In reality, however, individuals are subject to cognitive limitations and make systematic errors. We leverage established psychology on sample naivete to model individuals’ forecasting errors and biases in a way that is portable to operations models. The model has one behavioral parameter and embeds perfect rationality as a special case. We use the model to mathematically characterize point and error forecast behavior, reflecting an individual's beliefs about the mean and variance of a random variable. We then derive 10 behavioral phenomena which are inconsistent with perfect rationality assumptions, but supported by existing empirical evidence. Finally, we apply the model to two operations settings – inventory management and queuing – to illustrate the model's portability and discuss its numerous predictions. For inventory management, we characterize order decisions assuming behavioral demand forecasting. The model predicts that even under automated cost-optimization, one should expect a pull-to-center effect. It also predicts this effect can be mitigated by separating point forecasting from error forecasting. For base stock models, it predicts safety stocks are too small (large) for short (long) lead-times. We also express the steady state behavior of a queue with balking, assuming rational joining decisions but behavioral wait-time forecasts. The model predicts that joining customers tend to be disappointed in their experienced waits. Also, for long (short) lines, it predicts customers have more (less) disperse wait-time beliefs and tend to overestimate (underestimate) the true wait-time variance.

Keywords: behavioral operations, bounded rationality, forecasting, representativeness, optimizer’s curse, overconfidence, law of small numbers, newsvendor, inventory, queuing, judgment and decision-making

Suggested Citation

Tong, Jordan and Feiler, Daniel, A Behavioral Model of Forecasting: Naive Statistics on Mental Samples (March 20, 2016). Forthcoming in Management Science, DOI.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2537. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2666188 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2666188

Jordan Tong (Contact Author)

Wisconsin School of Business ( email )

975 University Avenue
Madison, WI 53706
United States

Daniel Feiler

Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth ( email )

Hanover, NH 03755
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics