Moral Hazard in Authoritarian Repression and the Fate of Dictators

Political Economist (Winter 2011): 7-9.

3 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2018

See all articles by Milan Svolik

Milan Svolik

Yale University - Department of Political Science

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

Why did soldiers stick with some dictators and break with others? In this essay, I suggest that the political position that militaries take during mass, pro-democratic uprisings is critically shaped by their role in authoritarian repression. While everyday repression in Middle Eastern dictatorships – as in most dictatorships – has been handled not by soldiers but instead by the police and specialized internal security agencies, these repressive agents simply do not have enough personnel, equipment, or training to suppress an uprising of several tens of thousands of protesters. Soldiers, therefore, are any dictator’s repressive agent of last resort.

Keywords: repression, dictatorship, moral hazard

JEL Classification: P16

Suggested Citation

Svolik, Milan, Moral Hazard in Authoritarian Repression and the Fate of Dictators (2011). Political Economist (Winter 2011): 7-9., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2668839

Milan Svolik (Contact Author)

Yale University - Department of Political Science ( email )

Box 208269
New Haven, CT 06520-8269
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
86
Abstract Views
518
Rank
531,713
PlumX Metrics