What Happened in Burlington?
47 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2015
Date Written: October 7, 2015
Abstract
Three visualization techniques illustrate the distribution of electoral preferences over a candidate triple. Two of them, introduced here, concern an IRV tally. The conditions that may allow the “pushover strategy” and the “No-Show Paradox”, are identified, and the practical consequences discussed. The controversial mayoral election of Burlington, Vermont, in 2009 is background. We see the IRV method in a legal and in a political context, presenting aspects of a judgment in the Minnesota Supreme Court 2009 and of the UK referendum over IRV in 2011. IRV is the single-seat version of STV. Both may achieve proportional voter influence with a designed disproportional distribution of seats in a legislature, e.g. as part of a potentially viable modus vivendi in ethnically divided societies.
Keywords: Electoral preferences, IRV tally, STV
JEL Classification: C00, D72
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
