Moral Judgments, Expressive Functions, and Bias in Immigration Law

17 Pages Posted: 13 Oct 2015 Last revised: 14 Oct 2015

Date Written: October 13, 2015

Abstract

In a lucid and trenchant style characteristic of Professor Hiroshi Motomura’s writing, "Immigration Outside the Law" offers rich descriptive and prescriptive analyses of three major themes underlying debates about unauthorized migration: the meaning of unlawful presence, state and local involvement in the regulation of unauthorized migration, and the integration of unauthorized migrants into American society. This review advances several ideas that I argue are important to understanding these key themes. In brief, I suggest that a more comprehensive understanding of public debates about unauthorized migration requires examining lay moral judgments about unlawful presence, the expressive functions of immigration law, and the nature of contemporary forms of racial and ethnic bias against Latinos. I discuss how considering these ideas in connection with the book’s key themes and arguments might extend, strengthen, and complicate the book’s analysis and insights.

Suggested Citation

Ryo, Emily, Moral Judgments, Expressive Functions, and Bias in Immigration Law (October 13, 2015). Immigration and Nationality Law Review (2016), Forthcoming, USC Legal Studies Research Papers Series No. 15-33, USC CLASS Research Paper No. CLASS15-31, Criminal Justice, Borders and Citizenship Research Paper No. 2673394, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2673394 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2673394

Emily Ryo (Contact Author)

Duke Law School ( email )

210 Science Drive
Durham, NC 27708
United States
6502483855 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
167
Abstract Views
1,389
Rank
355,175
PlumX Metrics