Do Nonrefunding Provisions Constrain Corporate Behavior? Evidence from Calls

Financial Management, Vol. 30, Iss. 1, Spring 2001

Posted: 15 May 2001

See all articles by Francis J. Kerins

Francis J. Kerins

Montana State University - Bozeman - College of Business

Abstract

I examine corporate call policy for nonrefundable debt. Nonrefundable bonds purportedly cannot be called with funds from lower-interest-cost debt. However, firms tend to call nonrefundable debt following interest rate decreases. The calling firms typically issue lower-interest-cost debt around the time of the call and do not identify the source of funds used to call the debt. These actions show the weakness of the constraints imposed by the nonrefunding provision on firms' call policies and may have led to the abandonment of the provision in the early 1990s and the adoption of potentially superior contracting mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

Kerins, Frank, Do Nonrefunding Provisions Constrain Corporate Behavior? Evidence from Calls. Financial Management, Vol. 30, Iss. 1, Spring 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=267866

Frank Kerins (Contact Author)

Montana State University - Bozeman - College of Business ( email )

446 Reid Hall
Bozeman, MT 59715
United States
406-994-4692 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
345
PlumX Metrics