The Gacaca Courts: Traditional Dispute Resolution in Post-Genocide Rwanda

24 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 2015 Last revised: 21 Jul 2016

See all articles by Colin O'Reilly

Colin O'Reilly

Creighton University

Chloe Zhang

Discover Financial Services

Date Written: July 19, 2016

Abstract

In the aftermath of the Rwandan genocide the crippled formal judicial system failed to administer justice in a timely manner. A modified version of the traditional Gacaca courts were introduced to hear cases from the backlog of over 100,000 genocide suspects. We find that the Gacaca courts performed well relative to the formal justice system given the constraints faced. The Gacaca courts generated valuable information about the genocide suspects and increased access to the justice system. The introduction of the Gacaca courts improved the performance of the formal justice system and facilitated post-conflict recovery.

Keywords: Law and Economics, Dispute Resolution, Rwanda, Comparative Institutions, Informal Institutions, Post-Conflict Recovery

JEL Classification: K40, O43, O55

Suggested Citation

O'Reilly, Colin and Zhang, Yi, The Gacaca Courts: Traditional Dispute Resolution in Post-Genocide Rwanda (July 19, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2679193 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2679193

Colin O'Reilly (Contact Author)

Creighton University ( email )

2500 California St.
Omaha, NE 68178
United States

Yi Zhang

Discover Financial Services ( email )

Riverwoods, IL 60015
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
355
Abstract Views
2,142
Rank
164,127
PlumX Metrics