The Misleading Interpretation of Security Council Resolution 242 (1967)

Jewish Political Studies Review, Vol. 23, No. 3/4, Addressing the Components of the Delegitimization of Israel (Fall 2011), pp. 7-17

11 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 2015

See all articles by Ruth Lapidoth

Ruth Lapidoth

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

Among the UN resolutions concerning the Middle East that are quite of the mentioned and referred to is Security Council Resolution 242 (1967). It has even been considered the building block of peace in the Middle East. Unfortunately, however, it has of the been misunderstood or misrepresented. The chapter will deal with two of these misleading interpretations. First, I will show that, contrary to certain opinions, the resolution does not request Israel to withdraw from all the territories occupied in the 1967 Six Day War. Second, I will show that, contrary to certain opinions, the resolution does not recognize that the Palestinian refugees have a right to return to Israel. It will be shown that the resolution recommends that the parties negotiate in good faith in order to reach an agreement based on certain principles, including an Israeli withdrawal to recognized and secure (i.e., agreed) borders, and a just settlement of the refugee problem reached by agreement.

Keywords: UN, Middle East, Resolution 242, 1967, Israel, Six Day War

Suggested Citation

Lapidoth, Ruth, The Misleading Interpretation of Security Council Resolution 242 (1967) (2011). Jewish Political Studies Review, Vol. 23, No. 3/4, Addressing the Components of the Delegitimization of Israel (Fall 2011), pp. 7-17. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2679233

Ruth Lapidoth (Contact Author)

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Scopus
Mount Scopus, IL 91905
Israel

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
70
Abstract Views
711
rank
325,292
PlumX Metrics