Team Bidding by Private Equity Sponsors: Are the Antitrust Allegations Plausible?

17 Pages Posted: 12 Nov 2015

See all articles by Robert Comment

Robert Comment

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Multiple version iconThere are 3 versions of this paper

Date Written: November 5, 2015

Abstract

The dozen largest private equity firms are accused of bid-rigging in the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market due to the practice of team bidding in groups known as clubs or consortia. The antitrust allegations are implausible, however, because the segments of the M&A market dominated by private equity firms are among the most competitive of all, sale processes are run by disinterested directors who’s permission generally is required before prospective buyers can team up, and the differential average offer premium paid by teams of private equity sponsors is zero.

Suggested Citation

Comment, Robert, Team Bidding by Private Equity Sponsors: Are the Antitrust Allegations Plausible? (November 5, 2015). Journal of Applied Finance (Formerly Financial Practice and Education), Vol. 23, No. 1, 2013, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2686748

Robert Comment (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
72
Abstract Views
841
Rank
236,297
PlumX Metrics