Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2687339
 


 



Risk, Race, & Recidivism: Predictive Bias and Disparate Impact


Jennifer L. Skeem


University of California, Berkeley

Christopher T. Lowenkamp


Government of the United States of America - Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts

June 14, 2016


Abstract:     
One way to unwind mass incarceration without compromising public safety is to use risk assessment instruments in sentencing and corrections. Although these instruments figure prominently in current reforms, critics argue that benefits in crime control will be offset by an adverse effect on racial minorities. Based on a sample of 34,794 federal offenders, we examine the relationships among race, risk assessment (the Post Conviction Risk Assessment [PCRA]), and future arrest. First, application of well-established principles of psychological science revealed little evidence of test bias for the PCRA — the instrument strongly predicts arrest for both Black and White offenders and a given score has essentially the same meaning — i.e., same probability of recidivism — across groups. Second, Black offenders obtain higher average PCRA scores than White offenders (d= 0.34; 13.5% non-overlap in groups’ scores), so some applications could create disparate impact. Third, most (66%) of the racial difference in PCRA scores is attributable to criminal history — which is already embedded in sentencing guidelines. Finally, criminal history is not a proxy for race, but instead mediates the relationship between race and future arrest . Data are more helpful than rhetoric, if the goal is to improve practice at this opportune moment in history.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: risk assessment, race, test bias, disparities, sentencing


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 8, 2015 ; Last revised: June 15, 2016

Suggested Citation

Skeem, Jennifer L. and Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Risk, Race, & Recidivism: Predictive Bias and Disparate Impact (June 14, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2687339 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2687339

Contact Information

Jennifer L. Skeem (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley ( email )
120 Haviland Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7400
United States
Christopher T. Lowenkamp
Government of the United States of America - Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts
One Columbus Circle N.E.
Washington, DC 20544
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,514
Downloads: 1,224
Download Rank: 11,882