Monetary Union and Fiscal Federalism
38 Pages Posted: 11 May 2001
Date Written: November 2000
Abstract
Does a monetary union need fiscal shock absorbers helping the participating countries to cope with asymmetric shocks? The consensus in the debate over EMU argues that the answer is yes. In this paper, we revisit the issue, building on a dynamic, general equilibrium framework of regions in a monetary union exposed to asymmetric shocks. We show that inter-regional taxes and transfers can stabilize regional employment or consumption, but not both. The welfare effects of such a stabilization are, however, ambiguous. In contrast to a popular argument in the EMU debate, inter-regional taxes and transfers do not reduce the incentives for goods and labour market deregulation in the regions, provided that the degree of trade integration among the regions is large. There is, however, reason to coordinate regional reform policies to avoid adverse effects on the aggregate performance of the union.
Keywords: Regional employment stabilization, monetary union, regional insurance
JEL Classification: E42, E63, F33, F42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Fiscal Federalism and Optimum Currency Areas: Evidence for Europe from the United States
-
Regional Nonadjustment and Fiscal Policy: Lessons for Emu
By Maurice Obstfeld and Giovanni Peri
-
Regional Risksharing and Redistribution in the German Federation
By Ralf Hepp and Jürgen Von Hagen
-
By Tamim Bayoumi and Paul R. Masson
-
Regional Income Redistribution and Risk Sharing How Does Italy Compare in Europe?
-
Monetary Policy in an Emerging European Economic and Monetary Union: Key Issues
-
How Many Monies? A Genetic Approach to Finding Optimum Currency Areas
By Atish R. Ghosh and Holger C. Wolf