The Structure of International Arbitration Law and the Exercise of Arbitral Authority

Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 229-266, November 2015

38 Pages Posted: 6 Dec 2015 Last revised: 28 Sep 2017

See all articles by Joshua Karton

Joshua Karton

Queen's University Faculty of Law; National Taiwan University - College of Law

Date Written: November 30, 2015

Abstract

Existing theoretical treatments of international arbitration deal adequately with the sources of international arbitrators’ authority to resolve disputes, but tend to neglect the exercise of that authority. In what ways is arbitral decision-making constrained? Are international arbitrators obliged to exercise their authority in any particular ways? If so, what are the sources of such obligations, and how might they be enforced? This article contributes to the theoretical literature on international commercial arbitration by adding a dimension that has thus far been neglected: the structure of the legal regime that governs international arbitrations. It applies a familiar concept from Anglo-American jurisprudence, H.L.A. Hart’s typology of primary and secondary rules, to argue that international arbitration law is essentially contractarian in its structure. The article concludes by considering the implications of the contractarian structure of international arbitration law for the ways that arbitrators may and must exercise their authority.

This article is part of a broader theoretical project on the sources of and constraints on arbitral authority. It should be seen as a partial draft of a work in progress, polished up for publication. Comments are welcome.

Keywords: international arbitration, arbitral role, legal theory, general jurisprudence, HLA Hart, primary and secondary rules, theories of international arbitration

Suggested Citation

Karton, Joshua, The Structure of International Arbitration Law and the Exercise of Arbitral Authority (November 30, 2015). Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 229-266, November 2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2699477

Joshua Karton (Contact Author)

Queen's University Faculty of Law ( email )

Macdonald Hall
128 Union St.
Kingston, Ontario K7L3N6
Canada

National Taiwan University - College of Law ( email )

No.1, Sec.4, Roosevelt Road
Taipei, 10617, 10617
Taiwan

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
211
Abstract Views
882
rank
142,662
PlumX Metrics